Research article | Open Access
Journal of Pedagogical Perspectives in Curriculum and Instruction Volume 1 (2026)
pp. 1 - 9 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/jppci.2026.1418.3
Publish Date: March 16, 2026 | Single/Total View: 4/3 | Single/Total Download: 5/4
Abstract
Education systems are currently experiencing rapid digital transformation, driven by advances in educational technology, artificial intelligence, and data-informed decision-making. Yet many institutional initiatives remain focused primarily on technological adoption rather than deeper organisational change. Emerging discussions around Industry 5.0 introduce a broader perspective that emphasises human well-being, sustainability, and resilience alongside technological progress. This conceptual article suggests that educational transformation should be approached through a whole-institution perspective in which digital innovation, sustainability, and institutional governance are considered together rather than as separate initiatives. Drawing on insights from a sustainability baseline conducted in a private high school operating within an international curriculum context in Türkiye, the article introduces the Whole-Institution Sustainability and Digital Transformation (WISDT) framework. The framework integrates operational sustainability, human well-being, and strategic digital integration as mutually reinforcing dimensions of school development. The discussion highlights implications for school leadership, institutional governance, and policy frameworks concerned with education for sustainable development. Ultimately, the future of education will depend less on the rapid adoption of new technologies and more on the ability of educational institutions to build adaptive, sustainable, and human-centred systems capable of navigating long-term change.
Keywords: Digital Transformation, Education for Sustainable Development, Educational Leadership, Industry 5.0, Institutional Resilience, Sustainability in Education
| How to Cite this Article? |
|---|
|
APA 7th edition Harvard Chicago 16th edition |
| References |
|---|
|
Bond, M., Marín, V. I., Dolch, C., Bedenlier, S., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2024). Digital transformation in education: A systematic review of research. Educational Technology Research and Development. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage. Dexter, S. (2018). The role of leadership for information technology in education: Systems of practice. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(2), 222–252. European Commission. (2021). Industry 5.0: Towards a sustainable, human-centric and resilient European industry. Publications Office of the European Union. Fisk, P. (2017). Education 5.0: The future of learning in the digital economy. GeniusWorks. Leal Filho, W., Salvia, A. L., Paço, A., & Brandli, L. (2021). The role of education in sustainability transitions. Sustainability, 13(16), 8976. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168976 OECD. (2020). Digital transformation in education: Building foundations for the future. OECD Publishing. OECD. (2025). Education policy outlook 2025: Digitalisation and sustainable education systems. OECD Publishing. Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury. Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday. Sterling, S. (2016). A commentary on education and sustainable development goals. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 10(2), 208–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408216661886 UNESCO. (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. UNESCO. UNESCO. (2024). Global education monitoring report 2024: Technology in education. UNESCO Publishing. Wals, A. E. J. (2020). Sustainability-oriented learning in times of climate crisis. Sustainability, 12(7), 2841. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072841 |